Cite as: 603 U. S. ____ (2024) 1
Opinion of the Court
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543,
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Nos. 22–451 and 22–1219
LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES, ET AL.,
PETITIONERS
22–451 v.
GINA RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
RELENTLESS, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS
22–1219 v.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
[June 28, 2024]
CHIEF J USTICE R OBERTS delivered the opinion of the
Court.
Since our decision in Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Re-
sources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 (1984), we have
sometimes required courts to defer to “permissible” agency
interpretations of the statutes those agencies administer—
even when a reviewing court reads the statute differently.
In these cases we consider whether that doctrine should be
overruled.
Supreme Court Opinion | Chevron Doctrine
